UBRISA

View Item 
  •   Ubrisa Home
  • Faculty of Humanities
  • History
  • Research articles (Dept of History)
  • View Item
  •   Ubrisa Home
  • Faculty of Humanities
  • History
  • Research articles (Dept of History)
  • View Item
    • Login
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Limitations of British territorial control in Bechuanaland Protectorate, 1918–1953

    Thumbnail
    View/Open
    Makgala_JSAS_2010.pdf (1.381Mb)
    Date
    2010
    Author
    Makgala, C.J.
    Publisher
    Routledge (Taylor and francis) www.routledge.com
    Link
    http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/03057071003607329
    Type
    Published Article
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    This article argues that the Kalahari desert region of the Kwena tribal reserve quietly slipped out of the imperial command from 1930–1950, at a time when British colonial authorities achieved territorial control of the tribal areas of Bechuanaland Protectorate (now Botswana)through the chiefs. The British had reluctantly colonised Bechuanaland and initially left the chiefs to their own devices. However, with a new generation of chiefs in office in the 1920s, numerous ‘ugly’ developments in the tribal areas, and lack of regulation of chiefly powers, forced the colonial government to tighten control. By the mid-1940s this appeared to have been achieved in most parts of the country. But the lack of resources and logistical difficulties, combined with weak tribal leadership at the Kwena tribal headquarters made the Kalahari desert impossible to police. Hence, it became a safe haven for alleged criminal elements, such as tax evaders and game poachers for example. The remote and isolated village of Tsetseng proved to be a particular problem for the colonial authorities and this ‘lawless’ area was only brought back into effective imperial control in 1953 after a difficult campaign. The article also argues that consultation and Tswana succession through primogeniture made indirect rule in Bechuanaland operate differently from other parts of British Africa.
    URI
    http://hdl.handle.net/10311/998
    Collections
    • Research articles (Dept of History) [30]

    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    Contact Us | Send Feedback
    Theme by 
    @mire NV
     

     

    Browse

    All of UBRISA > Communities & Collections > By Issue Date > Authors > Titles > SubjectsThis Collection > By Issue Date > Authors > Titles > Subjects

    My Account

    > Login > Register

    Statistics

    > Most Popular Items > Statistics by Country > Most Popular Authors