Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMolomo, M.G.
dc.date.accessioned2011-10-17T13:26:20Z
dc.date.available2011-10-17T13:26:20Z
dc.date.issued2000
dc.identifier.citationMolomo, M.G. (2000) In search of an alternative electoral system for Botswana, Pula: Botswana Journal of African Studies, Vol.14, No. 1, pp.109-121en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10311/900
dc.description.abstractElectoral systems are manipulative instruments that determine how elections are won and lost. Botswana is widely regarded as a frontrunner in democratic politics, but the electoral system that it operates has been wanting in some respects. Tthe First-past-the-post system has helped to consolidate democratic practice, and also provides for an effective link between Members of Parliament and their constituencies, but empirical evidence suggests that it is the least democratic electoral system. Its winner-take-all practic distorts electoral outcomes, and often produces minority governments. The article proceeds to discuss proportional representation (PR) and semi-proportional representation, and outlines their strengths and weaknesses. The paper concludes that since both the FPTP system and PR systems have inherent limitations, the best system would be one that draws on the best aspects of each system. The anicle recommends a variation of the Mixed-Member Proportionality system.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherPula: Botswana Journal of African Studiesen_US
dc.subjectElections Botswanaen_US
dc.subject.lcshElections--Botswanaen_US
dc.titleIn search of an alternative electoral system for Botswanaen_US
dc.typePublished Articleen_US
dc.linkhttp://archive.lib.msu.edu/DMC/African%20Journals/pdfs/PULA/pula014001/pula014001012.pdfen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record