Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorStone, Lesego S.
dc.contributor.authorNyaupane, Gyan P.
dc.date.accessioned2023-11-17T09:25:54Z
dc.date.available2023-11-17T09:25:54Z
dc.date.issued2016-05
dc.identifier.citationStone, L.S. & Nyaupane, G.P. (2016) Africans and protected areas: North–South perspectives, Annals of Tourism Research, Vol. 58, pp. 140-155en_US
dc.identifier.issn0160-7383 (Online)
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10311/2518
dc.description.abstractThe paper critically explores why most black Africans do not visit protected areas. More specifically, the study examines non-Western tourists’ perceptions of nature and nature-based tourism in comparison to Western tourists, using Botswana as a case study. The differences in perceptions are explored by adopting an interpretive paradigm to collect and analyze the data and using the North-South conceptualization of nature and tourism. Results indicate that for Western tourists visiting Botswana, nature symbolizes recreation, rejuvenation, and an opportunity “to get away from it all,” whereas for the Batswana, it is perceived as a part of everyday life, not an exclusive leisure space. Furthermore, Batswana’s conceptualization, relation to nature, and historical, cultural, and political backgrounds help explain their non-participation in nature-based tourism.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherScience Direct, https://www.sciencedirect.comen_US
dc.subjectNon-Westernen_US
dc.subjectProtected areasen_US
dc.subjectBotswanaen_US
dc.subjectNon-participationen_US
dc.subjectDisengagementen_US
dc.subjectDomestic tourismen_US
dc.subjectNature based tourismen_US
dc.subjectAfricaen_US
dc.subjectDeveloping countriesen_US
dc.titleAfricans and protected areas: North–South perspectivesen_US
dc.typePublished Articleen_US
dc.rights.holderElsevieren_US
dc.linkhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S016073831630038Xen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record