Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMolefi, Mooketsi
dc.contributor.authorTlhakanelo, John T.
dc.contributor.authorPhologolo, Thabo
dc.contributor.authorHamda, Shimeles G.
dc.contributor.authorMasupe, Tiny
dc.contributor.authorTsima, Billy
dc.contributor.authorSetlhare, Vincent
dc.contributor.authorMashalla, Yohana
dc.contributor.authorWiebe, Douglas J.
dc.date.accessioned2023-01-16T09:48:14Z
dc.date.available2023-01-16T09:48:14Z
dc.date.issued2021-10-28
dc.identifier.citationMolefi, M. et al. (2021) The impact of China’s lockdown policy on the incidence of CoVID-19: an interrupted time series analysis. BioMed Research International, Vol 2021, pp. 1-5en_US
dc.identifier.issn2314-6133 (Print)
dc.identifier.issn2314-6141 (Online)
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10311/2478
dc.descriptionNB: Some scientific formulas or symbols may not appear as they are on the original documenten_US
dc.description.abstractBackground. Policy changes are often necessary to contain the detrimental impact of epidemics such as those brought about by coronavirus disease (COVID-19). In the earlier phases of the emergence of COVID-19, China was the first to impose strict restrictions on movement (lockdown) on January 23rd, 2020. A strategy whose effectiveness in curtailing COVID-19 was yet to be determined. We, therefore, sought to study the impact of the lockdown in reducing the incidence of COVID-19. Methods. Daily cases of COVID-19 that occurred in China which were registered between January 12th and March 30th, 2020, were extracted from the Johns Hopkins CSSE team COVID-19 ArcGIS® dashboards. Daily cases reported were used as data points in the series. Two interrupted series models were run: one with an interruption point of 23 January 2020 (model 1) and the other with a 14-day deferred interruption point of 6th February (model 2). For both models, the magnitude of change (before and after) and linear trend analyses were measured, and β-coefficients reported with 95% confidence interval (CI) for the precision. Results. Seventy-eight data points were used in the analysis. There was an 11% versus a 163% increase in daily cases in models 1 and 2, respectively, in the preintervention periods (). Comparing the period immediately following the intervention points to the counterfactual, there was a daily increase of 2,746% () versus a decline of 207% () in model 2. However, in both scenarios, there was a statistically significant drop in the daily cases predicted for this data and beyond when comparing the preintervention periods and postintervention periods (). Conclusion. There was a significant decrease the COVID-19 daily cases reported in China following the institution of a lockdown, and therefore, lockdown may be used to curtail the burden of COVID-19.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherHindawi, https://www.hindawi.com/journals/bmri/en_US
dc.subjectChina's lockdown policyen_US
dc.subjectCOVID-19en_US
dc.subjectChinaen_US
dc.titleThe Impact of China’s lockdown policy on the incidence of COVID-19: an interrupted time series analysisen_US
dc.typePublished Articleen_US
dc.linkhttps://www.hindawi.com/journals/bmri/2021/9498029/#copyrighten_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record