UBRISA

View Item 
  •   Ubrisa Home
  • Theses and Dissertations
  • Faculty of Social Sciences Theses and Dissertations
  • Masters Dissertations
  • View Item
  •   Ubrisa Home
  • Theses and Dissertations
  • Faculty of Social Sciences Theses and Dissertations
  • Masters Dissertations
  • View Item
    • Login
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    The impact of Southern Africa Development Community (SADC) in regional conflict resolution: case of Zimbabwe, 2008-2018

    Thumbnail
    View/Open
    Maseko_Unpublished (MA)_2019.pdf (392.9Kb)
    Date
    2019
    Author
    Maseko, Francis Bobby
    Publisher
    University of Botswana, www.ub.bw
    Link
    Unpublished
    Type
    Masters Thesis/Dissertation
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    The research study is on the impact of Southern Africa Development Community (SADC) in regional conflict resolution, case study of Zimbabwe, 2008-2018. The study was a desktop which used documentary analysis methodology to collect and analyze data. Qualitative design is the approach that the study utilized. A hermeneutics of the documents and texts was done in order to explore the impact of SADC in solving conflict in Zimbabwe. The study identified that Zimbabwe’s conflict in the years 2008-2018 was mainly caused by irregular national elections whose results were contested. Though Zimbabwe violated SADC guidelines on conducting democratic elections in the region, SADC was not effective enough to solve the conflict. Lack of political will, solidarity politics and liberation legacy are among the factors that hindered SADC from solving Zimbabwe’s conflict effectively. The SADC mediators in Zimbabwe namely former South African Presidents Thabo Mbeki and Jacob Zuma were impartial in their mediation efforts and this gave President Mugabe an opportunity to violate several resolutions to be implemented by the Government of National Unity (GNU) in Zimbabwe. Soft diplomacy approach used by SADC in an attempt to solve Zimbabwe’s conflict was effective. Zimbabwe’s conflict escalated due to the fact that SADC could not use hard power in the name of the Standby Force though the nature of the conflict compelled them to do so. Owing to the shortcomings in the SADC conflict resolution efforts, Zimbabwe’s liberation and ruling party, ZANU-PF supported by some security forces unleashed violence against members of the opposition party MDC. There was bloodshed in Zimbabwe during 2008 and 2018 elections. The problem was exacerbated by ZANU-PF’s principles identical to Social Darwinism that nature is “a kill-or-be-killed.” This survival of the fittest ideology still persists in Zimbabwe and the conflict continues to escalate as it also leads to socio-economic challenges. The study suggested recommendations to be implemented so as to alleviate the conflict in Zimbabwe. Moreover the study identified the gap which requires further research.
    URI
    http://hdl.handle.net/10311/2376
    Collections
    • Masters Dissertations [55]

    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    Contact Us | Send Feedback
    Theme by 
    @mire NV
     

     

    Browse

    All of UBRISA > Communities & Collections > By Issue Date > Authors > Titles > SubjectsThis Collection > By Issue Date > Authors > Titles > Subjects

    My Account

    > Login > Register

    Statistics

    > Most Popular Items > Statistics by Country > Most Popular Authors