Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorKoerner, Sally E.
dc.contributor.authorBurkepile, Deron E.
dc.contributor.authorFynn, Richard W.S
dc.contributor.authorBurns, Catherine E.
dc.contributor.authorEby, Stephanie
dc.contributor.authorGovender, Navashni
dc.contributor.authorHagenah, Nicole
dc.contributor.authorMatchett, Katherine J.
dc.contributor.authorWilcox, Kevin R.
dc.contributor.authorCollins, Scott L.
dc.contributor.authorKirkman, Kevin P.
dc.contributor.authorKnapp, Allan K.
dc.contributor.authorSmith, Melinda D.
dc.contributor.authorThompson, Dave I.
dc.date.accessioned2019-06-07T13:46:40Z
dc.date.available2019-06-07T13:46:40Z
dc.date.issued2014-04-01
dc.identifier.citationKoerner, S.E. et al. (2014) Plant community response to loss of large herbivores differs between North American and South African savanna grasslands. Ecological Society of America, Vol. 95, No. 4, pp. 806-816en_US
dc.identifier.issn1939-9170
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10311/1952
dc.description.abstractHerbivory and fire shape plant community structure in grass‐dominated ecosystems, but these disturbance regimes are being altered around the world. To assess the consequences of such alterations, we excluded large herbivores for seven years from mesic savanna grasslands sites burned at different frequencies in North America (Konza Prairie Biological Station, Kansas, USA) and South Africa (Kruger National Park). We hypothesized that the removal of a single grass‐feeding herbivore from Konza would decrease plant community richness and shift community composition due to increased dominance by grasses. Similarly, we expected grass dominance to increase at Kruger when removing large herbivores, but because large herbivores are more diverse, targeting both grasses and forbs, at this study site, the changes due to herbivore removal would be muted. After seven years of large‐herbivore exclusion, richness strongly decreased and community composition changed at Konza, whereas little change was evident at Kruger. We found that this divergence in response was largely due to differences in the traits and numbers of dominant grasses between the study sites rather than the predicted differences in herbivore assemblages. Thus, the diversity of large herbivores lost may be less important in determining plant community dynamics than the functional traits of the grasses that dominate mesic, disturbance‐maintained savanna grasslands.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipAndrew W. Mellon Foundationen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherEcological Society of America; https://www.esa.org/esa/en_US
dc.rightsAuthorsen_US
dc.subjectDisturbanceen_US
dc.subjectDiversityen_US
dc.subjectFireen_US
dc.subjectFarben_US
dc.subjectGrassen_US
dc.subjectGrazingen_US
dc.subjectHerbaceous communityen_US
dc.subjectHerbivoryen_US
dc.subjectKonza Prairieen_US
dc.subjectUSAen_US
dc.subjectKruger National Parken_US
dc.subjectSouth Africaen_US
dc.subjectLarge-herbivore exclusionen_US
dc.subjectRichnessen_US
dc.titlePlant community response to loss of large herbivores differs between North American and South African savanna grasslands.en_US
dc.typePublished Articleen_US
dc.linkhttps://esajournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1890/13-1828.1en_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record