UBRISA

View Item 
  •   Ubrisa Home
  • Faculty of Health Sciences
  • School of Medicine
  • Research articles (School of Medicine)
  • View Item
  •   Ubrisa Home
  • Faculty of Health Sciences
  • School of Medicine
  • Research articles (School of Medicine)
  • View Item
    • Login
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Use of abbreviations and acronyms among healthcare workers in a resource limited setting

    Thumbnail
    View/Open
    Tsima_JHCC_2017..pdf (287.6Kb)
    Date
    2017-05-10
    Author
    Tsima, Billy M.
    Mbuka, Deogratias O.
    Mungisi, Maxwell
    Lephirimile, Eva
    Publisher
    Insight Medical Publishing, http://www.imedpub.com/
    Link
    http://healthcare-communications.imedpub.com/use-of-abbreviations-and-acronyms-among-healthcare-workers-in-a-resource-limited-setting.pdf
    Type
    Published Article
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    Context: Abbreviations and acronyms (A&A) are commonly used in both general and clinical settings to simplify and facilitate communication as well as means of saving time, space and effort. However, the use of abbreviations has been linked to patient safety issues. District hospitals operate with a heterogeneous community of healthcare workers presumably with diverse set of A&A in use. The use of A&A in these settings assumes that all have common understanding regarding the A&A used in patient records. We therefore aimed to assess the frequency, nature and healthcare workers' understanding of the meaning of the abbreviations and acronyms used in medical records at a district hospital in Botswana. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted over one month using inpatient medical charts at a district hospital in Botswana to produce a self-administered questionnaire assessing healthcare workers' understanding of abbreviations. Results: A total of 57 charts were included in the study. The total count of abbreviations, acronyms and symbols was 1693 representing 86 different groups. The score of correctly identified abbreviations was different among the three cadres of healthcare workers (P=0.001) assessed. Overall, the healthcare workers correctly identified 73% of the abbreviations. In fifty of the collated abbreviations (58.1%), participants suggested alternative meaning of the abbreviation. Conclusion: There is evidence that abbreviations are frequently used in medical notes at a district hospital in a resource limited setting. There is need to standardize abbreviations and acronyms used in clinical care to minimize the potential danger of compromised patient safety in district hospitals and similar settings.
    URI
    http://hdl.handle.net/10311/1933
    Collections
    • Research articles (School of Medicine) [87]

    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    Contact Us | Send Feedback
    Theme by 
    @mire NV
     

     

    Browse

    All of UBRISA > Communities & Collections > By Issue Date > Authors > Titles > SubjectsThis Collection > By Issue Date > Authors > Titles > Subjects

    My Account

    > Login > Register

    Statistics

    > Most Popular Items > Statistics by Country > Most Popular Authors