UBRISA

View Item 
  •   Ubrisa Home
  • Faculty of Health Sciences
  • School of Medicine
  • Research articles (School of Medicine)
  • View Item
  •   Ubrisa Home
  • Faculty of Health Sciences
  • School of Medicine
  • Research articles (School of Medicine)
  • View Item
    • Login
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    The diabetic foot risks profile in Selebi Phikwe Government Hospital, Botswana

    Thumbnail
    View/Open
    Tshitenge_AJPHCFM_2014.pdf (430.0Kb)
    Date
    2014-10-17
    Author
    Tshitenge, Stephane
    Ganiyu, Adewale
    Mbuka, Deogratias
    Shama, Joseph M.
    Publisher
    AOSIS, http://aosis.co.za/
    Link
    http://www.phcfm.org/index.php/phcfm/article/view/610
    Type
    Published Article
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    Aim: The present study aimed: (1) to evaluate the proportion of each diabetic foot (DF) risk category, according to the International Working Group on the Diabetic Foot (IWGDF) consensus, in patients attending the diabetic clinic in Selebi Phikwe Government Hospital (SPGH) and (2) to examine some of the facto rs that may be associated with the progression to higher risk categories such as anthropometric measurements, blood pressure, glycosylated haemoglobin (HbA1c) and lipid profile. Methods: A retrospective, cross sectional chart review of patients who had attended the diabetic clinic in SPGH from January 2013 to December 2013 was performed. Patients were included if they had undergone a foot examination. Patients with amputation due to accident were excluded. The DF risk category was assessed by determining the proportion of patients in each of four risk categories, as described by the IWGDF consensus. Results: The study encompassed 144 records from patients reviewed for foot examination from January to December 2013. Patients’ ages were between 16 and 85 years, 46 (40%) were male and 98 (60%) were female. The majority (122, [85%]) of patients were in DF risk category 0, whilst a limited number of patients were classified in risk category 1 (10, [6.9%]), risk category 2 (7, [4.9%]) and risk category 3 (5, [3.5%]). Most of the patients had the type 2 diabetes mellitus (139, [97%; 95% CI 92% − 99%]). Patients’ ages were associated with the progressively higher DF risk categories. The adjusted odd ratio was 1.1 (95% CI 1.03−1.14; p = 0.004). Conclusion: The present study revealed that about 15% of patients attending the SPGH diabetic clinic were categorised in higher risk groups for diabetic foot; patients’ ages were linked to the higher DF risk categories.
    URI
    http://hdl.handle.net/10311/1653
    Collections
    • Research articles (School of Medicine) [87]

    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    Contact Us | Send Feedback
    Theme by 
    @mire NV
     

     

    Browse

    All of UBRISA > Communities & Collections > By Issue Date > Authors > Titles > SubjectsThis Collection > By Issue Date > Authors > Titles > Subjects

    My Account

    > Login > Register

    Statistics

    > Most Popular Items > Statistics by Country > Most Popular Authors