Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorNkomazana, Oathokwa
dc.contributor.authorMoosa, Shabir
dc.contributor.authorWojczewski, Silvia
dc.contributor.authorHoffmann, Kathryn
dc.contributor.authorPoppe, Annelien
dc.contributor.authorPeersman, Wim
dc.contributor.authorWillcox, Merlin
dc.contributor.authorMaier, Manfred
dc.contributor.authorDerese, Anselme
dc.contributor.authorMant, David
dc.date.accessioned2017-04-10T14:18:52Z
dc.date.available2017-04-10T14:18:52Z
dc.date.issued2013
dc.identifier.citationMoosa, Shabir et al (2013) Why there is an inverse primary-care law in Africa, Lancet Global Health, Vol. 1, No. 6, pp. 332-333en_US
dc.identifier.issn2214-109x
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10311/1636
dc.description.abstractMany low-income and middle-income countries are now pursuing ambitious plans for universal primary care, but are failing to deliver adequate care quality because of intractable human resource problems—eg, in Uganda in 2009, 44% of health-worker posts were vacant in urban health centres and 57% were vacant in smaller rural health centres.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherElsevier; https://www.elsevier.com/en_US
dc.subjectUniversal primary careen_US
dc.subjectinverseen_US
dc.subjectprimary-care lawen_US
dc.subjectSub-Saharan Africaen_US
dc.subjectAfricaen_US
dc.titleWhy there is an inverse primary-care law in Africaen_US
dc.typePublished Articleen_US
dc.linkhttp://www.thelancet.com/pdfs/journals/langlo/PIIS2214-109X(13)70119-0.pdfen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record