UBRISA

View Item 
  •   Ubrisa Home
  • Theses and Dissertations
  • Faculty of Humanities Theses and Dissertations
  • Masters Dissertations
  • View Item
  •   Ubrisa Home
  • Theses and Dissertations
  • Faculty of Humanities Theses and Dissertations
  • Masters Dissertations
  • View Item
    • Login
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Participation and rural development in contemporary Botswana: rhetoric or reality? the case of Mmankgodi village

    Thumbnail
    View/Open
    Seleka_Unpublished (MA)_2015.xps (2.077Mb)
    Date
    2015
    Author
    Seleka, Malatsi L.
    Link
    Unpublished
    Type
    Masters Thesis/Dissertation
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    Participatory approaches and methods have over the years been justified as a precondition for sustainable rural development. Participation entails the involvement of in-community stakeholders in the initiation, implementation, and evaluation of development interventions and policies that are designed to change their lives. The study sought to investigate the nature and extent of beneficiary participation in rural development planning and management in Botswana using the village of Mmankgodi as a case study. The research made use of qualitative research methodologies over quantitative as they were ideal for the type of data collected. In-depth interviews and focus group discussions were used as data gathering instruments. In-depth interview respondents were selected using purposive sampling and for focus group discussion participants, snowball sampling was used. The analysis of the data was aided by the use of the Community Action Plan (CAP) framework. Findings revealed that participation in the problem identification, project initiation, implementation and evaluation of rural development projects in Mmankgodi is significantly limited. This is attributed to the centralized nature of rural development processes in Botswana, disjointed participatory structures, lack of a participatory framework, ineffective participatory forums and negative perceptions of development workers towards the community’s input, hence imposing their perceptions of particular development situations undermining those put forward by the community. Based on these findings, and consistent with the wider literature, the recommendation is that a community participation framework be established and adhered to. Establishing sound participatory networks will also be useful as well as taking into account community perceptions of development to improve sustainability of rural development projects.
    URI
    http://hdl.handle.net/10311/1502
    Collections
    • Masters Dissertations [74]

    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    Contact Us | Send Feedback
    Theme by 
    @mire NV
     

     

    Browse

    All of UBRISA > Communities & Collections > By Issue Date > Authors > Titles > SubjectsThis Collection > By Issue Date > Authors > Titles > Subjects

    My Account

    > Login > Register

    Statistics

    > Most Popular Items > Statistics by Country > Most Popular Authors